About “This Is Radio: Daniel Alarcon”
For the intro to Daniel’s piece, I think approaching things from the perspective of a radio producer helped overcome creative obstacles.
Daniel spoke in his interview (primarily bits we didn’t end up using) about Radio Ambulante being a showcase for Spanish-language stores from around the world, and of the power of being able to hear the differences in regional dialects.
So what came to mind was an audio montage of these different ways of speaking with the visuals as a guide. The producers of Radio Ambulante sent over a file of interviews, identifying where each speaker was from. The montage features the voice of the speaker while visually focusing on their home country as it appears on a spinning globe.
In this sense, the video takes the place that in an audio piece would traditionally be taken by a narrator. Giving us context and letting us know what we’re listening to. And like a narrator, it needs to give just enough information without spelling out too much and taking away from the interview tape.
I think it’s cool looking and an effective way of mirroring what Daniel tries to do with his show. But of course it’s just one way of doing it. I’d love to hear how others would approach this. Let me know in the comments if you thought it was effective or what you would have done.
- Pictured here is the standard two camera setup I use to film most of the interviews. Both cameras are filming simultaneously, one with a tight shot, the other with a wider shot. That way, when you want to cut up your interview, you can swap between the tight and the wide shot so your cuts don’t look too jumpy. You can also cover those cuts with b-roll, but having a second angle gives you more options. Just make sure the two cameras are on the same side of the subject (say, both to the left side or right side of them). Otherwise the cuts may look jarring. Footage of your subject’s hand gestures are also good to cover up cuts.
- Those ARE people on top of the Golden Gate Bridge in the first shot after the title. I didn’t even notice it until the first cut of the video.
- The globe spinning made a horribly rusty sort of noise. Instead, I used sound found on a website called freesound.org — a great resource for audio and video producers.
- You’ll notice in the background of the interview, the studio space is a different color cast than Daniel. That’s because we’re using what’s called a tungsten light to light the interview and the studio behind us had florescent lights. That gives the setting a greenish hue. Different light sources have different color temperatures which translate to different hues. Usually you want to make sure all your light sources are the same, but in the interview I sort of liked the different color in the background; it made Daniel pop out a bit and kept focus on him.
- We used a camera slider for some of the shots in the studio. As I mentioned before with Roman Mars’ This is Radio episode, I find moderation is key with a slider. But it’s a cheap way to up your production value. And Chris Wardle, who helped with the video in this episode, did a great job I think. Note the shot with the mic stands in the foreground. When using a slider, to maximize the… umm… slidey effect, having things in the foreground helps. You get some nice motion while keeping your subject central.
If you like what people are saying about this series...
Help Transom get new work and voices to public radio by donating now.